Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Movies
May 8, 2015 17:35:19 GMT
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2015 17:35:19 GMT
Also, I actually think that the Hobbit films are better than the LOTR. Please don't shoot me.
I'm serious. In my opinion, they don't drag on as long, even though they're all around the same length as the LOTR films. I was bored 3 quarters of the way through The Two Towers and begging for the film to end, whereas The Desolation of Smaug was great from start to finish. The Hobbit films, while still more serious than the novel theyre based on, all have a charming and whimsical feel to them. There were some flaws, the most prominent being that the films lack a lot of serious character development and occasionally lack focus (Alfrid was funny, but upon watching it a second time, I realised that he possibly ended up having more screen time than Bilbo, the main freaking character! And he wasn't even in the book, mind you), but they're great.
|
|
|
Post by corvette1710 on May 8, 2015 23:03:24 GMT
Spoiler and /spoiler in brackets.
|
|
|
Movies
May 9, 2015 0:14:03 GMT
Post by Ruinus on May 9, 2015 0:14:03 GMT
Oh I see, the preview doesn't show the spoiler as actually working. The problem I had with Avengers 2 is that I wasn't sure what the theme was supposed to be. I understood what was happening, what the motivations are, but what was it about? If it's about the Avengers learning to work together despite their fears, that seems pretty lame because they learned to work together in the first movie, overcoming Loki's manipulation that turned them all against each other. Was it about how the Avengers weren't needed anymore, something which Ultron was trying to get through to them? If so, that message is shot to death when the new team shows up at the end. Or was it purely about this particular team deciding to hang up their capes? If so, Tony is the odd-man out, since there's no character motivation in the movie for him to give up, other than perhaps his recurring trauma over the nuke event.
One message that bothered me was Ultron itself. The idea is, or was, that Tony Stark creates an AI network to safeguard the planet, from aliens and possibly from mankind itself. Near the end of the movie, where he basically wants to re-purpose the Vision body to be that AI guardian, Captain wants to stop him. Presumably out of the fear that Tony will fuck up and make another AI threat. Tony says something like "I don't want to hear the "Man shall not meddle!" speech anymore" to Bruce when first discussing the Ultron project, referencing the argument that AIs shouldn't be created because creating life is wrong or that mankind shouldn't overstep it's bounds, etc. Ultron's fall towards evil is, without Bruce pointing it out, basically the physical interpretation that "man should not meddle". So so far the movie is sorta following that argument.
Except Jarvis exists. Hell, by the end of the movie Tony creates FRIDAY to help him during the final battle.
It's clear that Jarvis (and probably FRIDAY) aren't as advanced as the scepter AI, but the basic point remained - Tony had already created examples of incredibly friendly AI that can successfully manage a company and that Tony trusted enough to run his Iron Man and Iron Legion suits.
In that way, any objections to Jarvis being downloaded into the Vision body sorta fly out the window. The team, and Tony, already trust Jarvis enough with potentially dangerous technology.
Unfortunately, the movie, at least to me, thematically smashes this point too, since it requires the intervention of Thor and his magic god powers to make the Vision alive. Reinforcing the idea, at least symbolically (with Thor's thunder giving that spark that Tony's computer coding couldn't) man couldn't meddle in the affairs of creating life.
And, in the end, Ultron is basically right. Tony wanted to change the world, build an army smarter than any previous person, autonomous and ever vigilant that would defend against alien threats. The rest of the team didn't, because they wanted to save the world but not change it.
I mean shit, what does Captain America do? Goes back to his military base, calling it home. He starts up a new Avengers program. Captain's argument that they'll face the threat "together" if another alien armada shows up is short sighted at best, dangerous at worst. It assumes that their little team of people will be able to respond to an army of invaders.
Tony could have, and should have, rightfully pointed out that Jarvis operated the Iron Legion during their initial assault on Striker/Strucker?/whateverhisname's base in the first scenes of the movie. He could have easily said that it is entirely within his capability to add more Iron Legionnaires and have Jarvis control more of them and that relying solely on their little group is absurd.
Tony, and probably Bruce, were the only people who seemed aware that their little group can't, and shouldn't be the only line of defense the Earth has. Something which Captain Fury knew in the first movie when SHIELD was using alien technology to build advanced weapons. Those three characters wanted to change the world, Captain America didn't. He wanted to stay in a military base, play hero because he didn't have a home to return to, and, frankly, didn't want to make the effort to build a home. It's exactly like Ultron said, he's only special because of a war.
|
|
|
Post by silversurfer092 on May 9, 2015 0:58:56 GMT
Avengers 2 was the exact same as the first Avengers, except the team falls apart before they come back together instead of being separate before coming together. It's like a re-skin in video games, except I had very low expectations for Avengers 2 and therefore liked it a whole lot more.
|
|
|
Post by Ruinus on May 14, 2015 2:36:41 GMT
I just found out that the ending for Terminator 2 is much better in the original book version. Unlike in the movie, where the Terminator is robbed of agency by not being able to destroy himself and stating that it can't cry though knows why John does, the book version is able to destroy itself.
But more importantly, before he jumps to his death, Sarah asks the Terminator "Are you afraid?" To which the Terminator responds "Yes." The book then briefly goes into his mind, where he has developed a world view "vaster and wider than anything Skynet could have imagined" and wonders if there is an afterlife.
|
|
|
Movies
May 18, 2015 3:49:32 GMT
AvP likes this
Post by Ruinus on May 18, 2015 3:49:32 GMT
Mad Max was awesome. For the first 10 minutes I could swear I was watching a WH40K movie. It also has one of the most metal characters I've ever seen in my life.
|
|
|
Post by AvP on May 19, 2015 23:00:04 GMT
Mad Max is brilliant. It gave me the same straightforward, high-octane shot of adrenaline Dredd did back when I first saw that.
WIIITNEEEEESSS IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT
|
|
|
Movies
May 20, 2015 1:45:04 GMT
AvP likes this
Post by corvette1710 on May 20, 2015 1:45:04 GMT
Holy shit Mad Max. What an awesome goddamn movie.
|
|
|
Movies
May 20, 2015 12:34:41 GMT
Post by AvP on May 20, 2015 12:34:41 GMT
It also has one of the most metal characters I've ever seen in my life. You better be talking about that electric guitar-playing motherfucker who strummed like a madman the entire chase, by the way. What a beast.
|
|
|
Movies
May 20, 2015 14:25:29 GMT
Post by shockwave on May 20, 2015 14:25:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ruinus on May 20, 2015 16:58:23 GMT
It also has one of the most metal characters I've ever seen in my life. You better be talking about that electric guitar-playing motherfucker who strummed like a madman the entire chase, by the way. What a beast. You know it. That dude, along with the blonde and the redhead were the best actors in the movie. Though for completely different reasons.
|
|
|
Movies
May 28, 2015 2:17:02 GMT
Post by shockwave on May 28, 2015 2:17:02 GMT
|
|
|
Movies
May 28, 2015 5:44:43 GMT
Post by corvette1710 on May 28, 2015 5:44:43 GMT
Pls never again
|
|
|
Movies
May 28, 2015 16:59:31 GMT
Post by silversurfer092 on May 28, 2015 16:59:31 GMT
Mad Max was RIDICULOUS and that's the only way I know how to explain it.
|
|
|
Movies
May 28, 2015 17:50:05 GMT
Post by bigballerju on May 28, 2015 17:50:05 GMT
Night hasn't made a great movie since Unbreakable. He was a flash in a pan Director apparently. I don't fucking get how he still gets work in Hollywood.
|
|