Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2017 19:06:35 GMT
OK, so I've known about Wonder Woman being the UN's representative for the empowerment of women and girls for some time, but literally just now I heard that they removed the character from that position because feminist complained that Wonder Woman's design is "problematic".
Now, I wouldn't call myself a feminist, but I'm not some kind of raging antifeminist either, but either way, this makes my eyes roll infinitely. I found that the position that Wonder Woman was in was a harmless, heartwarming thing, because there are obviously women out there in disadvantaged positions and Wonder Woman has been an icon for female empowerment for decades. You would think that most feminists would be alright with all this, but no. While my feelings about third wave feminism tend to waver, this is one of the many instances that have made the movement lose practically all credibility, even if not all feminists agree on whether or not this was right. More and more women I know that perhaps did once subscribe to feminism have now abandoned it.
Wonder Woman's only a fictional character, sure, this isn't really a big deal, sure, and this I'm not gonna start any angry petitions demanding for the character's reinstatement, but the core of what I'm saying here is that this kind of self-debilitating behaviour that modern feminists tend to do is baffling and ridiculous. They practically shat on a perfectly harmless little celebration of the character's history of saving people in the DCU, and inspiring people in real life.
|
|
|
Post by g4hardcore on Feb 6, 2017 2:24:33 GMT
What, problematic how? The only thing I can think of is how scantily clad she is. That, and the whole fictional thing.
|
|
|
Post by Ruinus on Feb 9, 2017 21:24:35 GMT
The petition to remove her mentions a few of their gripes, which seem to be: - "It is alarming that the United Nations would consider using a character with an overtly sexualized image at a time when the headline news in United States and the world is the objectification of women and girls."
- "The image that Wonder Woman projects (life-size cut outs of which have already appeared at UNHQ) is not culturally encompassing or sensitive"
- "The bottom line appears to be that the United Nations was unable to find a real life woman that would be able to champion the rights of ALL women on the issue of gender equality and the fight for their empowerment."
The first two arguments I look on with some cynicism. The first one is the one that I think most people picked up on. I don't know where people draw the line between a female character being sexy and sexualized, but there you go. The second argument makes me immediately think that what the petition actually wants to say is "Wonder Woman is white, and that's not culturally diverse enough", which is fine... but at the same time, if they had picked a black fictional icon you could still make the same argument. The third argument makes the most sense while still shooting itself in the foot. The petition references Emma Watson, the real life UN ambassador for women, so suggesting that the UN just can't think of real women to elevate to important UN positions is negated within the petition itself.
But I do understand the gist of that last argument, that female empowerment shouldn't be left up to corporate mascots and instead handed to real people. Had all criticisms of Wonder Woman's appointment been centered on that I would have wholeheartedly agreed.
|
|