|
Post by silversurfer092 on Mar 28, 2016 19:26:55 GMT
Discuss why you think it's not terrible and I'll tell you why you're wrong. Feel free to post spoilers without having those annoying Spoiler warnings.
|
|
|
Post by corvette1710 on Mar 29, 2016 23:54:46 GMT
Okay. You want me to copy/paste the shit that was in spoiler tags from the other thread? 'Cause I think that'd be better than restating my points.
|
|
|
Post by silversurfer092 on Mar 30, 2016 1:35:02 GMT
Whatever you gotta do.
|
|
|
Post by corvette1710 on Mar 30, 2016 2:22:36 GMT
Alright, so overall, I really enjoyed the movie; however, that may just be relief because it was better than I expected it to be. I'm going to be realistic here and say that with a second watch I might have different opinions, but I honestly thought it was going to be a pile of shit with cool explosions and slow-mo. It did out-perform that expectation.
That said, the dream-within-a-dream thing going on with Bruce was probably my least favorite scene. I don't know who the fuck was coming out of a portal or whatever in the second dream of his Dreamception (maybe because I'm not up-to-date on Arrow and I haven't seen The Flash). It confused me as a casual watcher of DC visual media. It shouldn't have. Shit needs to be explained without callbacks to other series, considering this is the first Batfleck movie.
I also just really fucking hate how every movie with Batman in it has to show his parents dying. We get it because the scene has been done so/too many goddamn times. There was nothing particularly special about this one, other than showing how much Batman misses his mother. Without that scene (and the re-showings of that scene, I think I counted two or three), I could've easily gotten the same effect from one, maybe two scenes of Bruce visiting their tomb (considering we're not even shown Thomas Wayne's headstone/plaque). It could've been more subtle and just as easily understood (or maybe I'm overestimating the attention span of the average moviegoer for whom the film is made).
I enjoyed Superman and Batman's fight for the most part, but there's no real reason to me that every Kryptonite round didn't have a delayed explosion like the first (the one Superman catches). I considered that maybe they were set to explode on impact and explode on a short timer, but wouldn't Superman's stopping of the bullet be considered an impact, what with his skin being essentially rock and shit? It didn't seem to me that he was handling the projectile with any special care so as not to aggravate the substance inside--he had no idea it was filled with Kryptonite dust. I also didn't see any detonator in Batman's hand (unless it's on the gun?). It didn't make much sense to me, but the brawling part of the fight was good.
The fight with Doomsday is where I felt that Batman was most useless in the movie. It makes sense, considering he has essentially no way to fight Doomsday, but I was a little peeved that he was essentially left to his own devices to do little but dodge and watch. I also understand that his weapon was used to kill Doomsday, and maybe he distracted him with the Kryptonite round just before Superman stabbed him, but overall I felt like he didn't contribute much.
Superman's death kind of caught me off-guard; I didn't expect them to kill him off, actually. I didn't think they had the balls to surprise people who haven't read/heard of Hunter/Prey with the apparent death of Superman. Bravo, movie (until the JLA movie).
On to Lex Luthor; I'm not sure why he was so obviously... unhinged in this movie. Shit, his lines barely made sense. He was more a Joker figure than a mastermind. Giving Superman the ultimatum between the death of Martha Kent and the death of the Batman was almost straight out of The Dark Knight. Now, sure, Batman wasn't nearly as important to Superman as Martha, which ruins some of the parallelism of Batman having to choose between Rachel and Harvey Dent, but wasn't Harvey Dent also less important to Batman than Rachel was? I think so, and I think this movie stole that from TDK. However, I don't think Jesse Eisenberg was really a bad choice (even though I'd have paid lots of money for Bryan Cranston to play Luthor). With what he was given lines-wise (if they weren't improvised), I think Jesse Eisenberg did a damn fine job of playing a genius who doesn't think Superman should have the status that he does, and would do anything to take it from him.
It will ruin his presidential bid in later installments, though, what with getting caught and receiving jail-time.
Wonder Woman wasn't nearly a big enough part of the movie for me, as well. I understand that she's not exactly receiving top billing (read: the title), but I really feel like the plot could've done without her for the most part. Feel free to disagree, but I'm pretty sure Doomsday was dumb enough to run into the spear anyway if Wondy hadn't been holding him still for a time. That said, had she been given top billing and more screentime, she would've done an even better job.
Mostly what I want is a live-action Flashpoint Paradox movie.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2016 19:27:37 GMT
I nearly fell asleep.
Seriously, I nearly dozed off while watching this boring arse movie. Let's start with the lack of focus on the characters that should get more screentime as our first big flaw here. Given that Batman gets top billing over Superman and that he hasn't appeared in the DC Cine- *ahem* "Extended Universe" before, I wasn't surprised that he received the most focus. But it was completely unnecessary. Just as corvette said, we did not need to recap Batsy's origins again and see the Joe Chill scene once more. We did not need to hear him passive-aggressively arguing with Alfred or see him silently brooding anymore. Everyone knows who Batman is, what he's all about, etc.. I was just so surprised at how little focus Wonder Woman got. As a fan of DC's characters and their histories, I know Diana's backstory and general character, but I couldn't help but think about how utterly confused and bewildered by her presence less comic-literate people in the audience must have been. It's a crime that Wonder Woman has never even been near the big screen before, yet the entire audience is expected to know exactly who she is and why she's helping Batman and Superman out. I at least found it quite interesting that they are taking further cues from the original Earth-Two comic universe in that Alfred is introduced as being only slightly older than Bruce and having not raised him from childhood like modern versions of Alfred have.
The fight scene between Batman and Superman was poorly handled, but at least quite well choreographed. Superman gave Batman was too many chances, the most glaring being the part where Batman tries to load the krytonite round and it takes him like a minute, yet Clark just kind of stands there and watches him do it.
And then there's Doomsday. As soon as Doomsday shows up, it becomes clearer that DC are trying to imitate the success of The Avengers, but whereas the Avengers fight all around entire cities against whole armies of monsters, Superman and Wonder Woman (Batman's not really a part of the fight) battle this big, spiky asshole in one boring ruined location. No explanation is given in the film to explain how Diana's sword can cut Doomsday while nukes barely bruise him, and as with a disturbing number of things in this film, the audience is just expected to accept it. I don't really get why they basically turned him into Titano the Super-Ape. I suppose that they felt the need to make him massive and give him heat vision to make him seem more threatening, but considering that he only had to fight two superheroes, it probably wasn't that necessary. While it was kinda cool and "holy shit!" inducing to make Doomsday a giant, I couldn't help but make the comparisons.
I personally found Jesse Eisenberg as Luthor to be something of a highlight. While it's made clear from the get-go that something's clearly not right with him, I like how this version passes off his insanity with a facade of eccentricity and can get away with it since he's a philanthropist. It's going to be quite interesting to see where they take this character after Superman's (apparent) death, that is if he is brought back at all (I think I heard somewhere that Eisenberg didn't really like playing the part). I wonder whose rogues gallery he might join?
Speaking of Superman's death, it took me off guard. I thought that a cheap "lol, just a coma bro" resurrection scene would be coming, but I was surprised when it didn't. I don't really know what that whole thing with the dirt on the coffin was or what it meant. If it means that Superman survived like in the comics, then it was at least more subtle (but less cool) than the ending of League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. Either this Superman has greater gravity powers or something else happened, I don't know. Don't really care too much to be honest. In the same way I don't particularly care that this version of Batman kills people.
As you can see, I'm getting into the good parts now. It's not all whine-whine-whine. Batman's vendetta against Clark makes sense and it was a great way to link the previous film's plot with this one and the realistic reactions to an all-powerful alien's destructive antics is handled surprisingly well. It's quite good how this film kind of acknowledges Man of Steel's primary flaw, that being Superman's insane over-destructiveness and shows how it totally wasn't okay. But there was simply too much buildup to the climactic fights that we all knew would be way over-hyped. A lot of what was shown on screen could have been summed up far quicker and more interesting action could have happened instead.
A flaw second only to the focus based flaw I mentioned was that they simply tried to stuff too much into this film and did not use the time wisely to do that. They probably could have managed to fit in more of Wonder Woman or Aquaman or Cyborg if the film hadn't wasted our time with scenes of Superman and Batman brooding and doing pointless shit. The dream sequences were a complete waste of time and an obvious attempt to create interest in the DCEU with plot lines that they will probably elaborate on in future films. When a Flash movie (a Flash movie is coming out, right? I can't keep up anymore) is released, the "Lois is the key" scene might make perfect sense, but for now it makes no sense at all. Suicide Squad better be good. If it isn't, then I'm giving up all hope for this franchise.
Also, Zack Snyder probably thought he was real clever by making a big deal out of Batman and Superman both having mothers named Martha. It perhaps leads to the most anti climatic and awkward end to a fight scene in any film to ever exist. Batman goes from trying to murder Superman in cold blood by stabbing him through the chest with a kryptonite javelin to saying that he's a friend of Superman's to Martha Kent. You would think that a dramatic, serious scene between Superman and his mum would happen at some point after she was kidnapped and nearly tortured to death, but that never happened.
4/10
|
|